Chickenpox Maculopapular

help themselves to help others.

Spinosa said: " Just my happiness can make the happiness of others."

The most common objection is that if a person thinks to herself does not think that is selfish to others.

This is according to me a false problem.

Imagine a doctor who wants to succeed and should not only be helpful to his patients become rich thanks to his work. Obviously I'm talking about a doctor honestly think that only the good of his patients / customers.

To be successful, must be good, that is to be able to care for their patients, or, better yet, prevent these from being sick. In order to do this is to be very good, making it even better, help many people. In this way, will spread the voice, and the number of his patients will increase, increasing also its revenue. Patients will be preserved in health care or return assets in the company to perform their tasks.

make an example more clear and articulate. If a consultant helps

a director of a company to improve its ability to communicate with employees, they will feel more valued, work better, imagine that these are doctors, nurses, teachers see it as a done deal "for themselves" cause a reaction positive chain that is reflected in many areas of society.

If a parent in trouble download my eBook education, improves his way to speak with her children, and these, growing in charge and make sure they move effectively procuring success in life to them and to others, family, friends, colleagues, etc..

I talked to doctors and counselors, teachers or directors of the company, but if it were not for the street sweepers who clean the streets, the chefs who cook, maintenance workers of ... everything, would not be possible even the cha apparently things are "more important".

This is true for anyone telecom operator, hotel porter, for each job that you can play in our society.

All these people work for themselves "and thus do good to others.

not remember who said this sentence: "No matter what you do but try to do it as best you can." (more or less said so). But

encloses the sense of what I say.

A parent who "let his son if the cords alone," when they can do of course, reinforces the character much more over-protective attitudes that characterize many aspects of modern education that produces in fact, mostly young fragile, with low self-esteem and difficulties in their way in life. The aid must be given when necessary and should enhance the ability of the recipient, do not feel like an incompetent takes place with the aid in excess.

A parent who does not understand the importance of strengthening the character and personal autonomy hiding behind the phrase: "poor thing is small / young, must help him in everything" (from the study tasks and to tie his shoes in 15 years ), hidden behind this "aid that makes it incapable" personal difficulties and actually responds to her need is not that of the son or daughter.

In such a difficult time, from the economic point of view and not only, if everybody were to think about how to improve ourselves, we could certainly improve our surroundings and we do not like or that it poses a problem, whether work or money, the education of children or the relationship with others.

Who thinks to self-improvement, better (and helps) inevitably others.

For those who want to help (True) my advice Report on achieving their personal goals.

Good growth and the next.