Monday, October 25, 2010

Porcelain Mark Two Arrows Crossing

Tremonti plaster

Gianfranco Prini (not ends), points out that Tremonti has few degrees of freedom in the management of finances, as evidenced by what he himself wrote in the recent decision of the Public Finance .

In particular:
  • balances 2011-13 budgets are set by law hereby approved before the summer and on which there is the OK of the EU under the Stability Pact (remember the statements of the then Tremonti "We have secured the accounts", etc..?)
  • those balances may be changed by ordinary only in 2011 for the period 2012-14, and so on for periods rolling 3-year (if you change the balances during the year - which I do not know to what extent it is possible under Law 196 of 31.12.2009 - we must turn to undergo the EU for re-approval) from
  • ' Next year this process will tremontiana endorsed by the EU, with variations, and will become mandatory for all member countries.
In other words, it appears that:
  • what is now not in those balances will not be able to go to edit in addition to the possible revision of the 2012 sale of the operation which was approved in late 2011 (ie already this year is ; become impossible to storm the diligence of past financial, in which the end there slipped into a bit 'of everything)
  • confirming the previous point: the Budget Committee of the House last week rejected a dozen amendments (including the money for 9000 new members proposed by Gelmini as a bargaining chip for the rapid approval of "his" law)
  • the only possible way to give more funds to the MIUR is to divert as many from the budgets of other ministries (Can you imagine how easy it is, after all have suffered a linear cut 10% - with interiors that do not have the money to buy gasoline for the bats, and that goes a miliardozzo still found plenty to finance our commitments in Afghanistan, renewed and changed, etc..?)
  • unless they grow tax revenues (which are in decline: the only way to do this would be to raise the rates 2011, or reopen any amnesty, etc.). or who spend less than expected (never happened in more than 60 years of republican history)

0 comments:

Post a Comment